The numbers are shocking – one-third of all food produced worldwide goes to waste in global food value chains yearly. More than 135 million people face acute hunger today. This number could reach 840 million by 2030. The recent COVID-19 pandemic revealed just how fragile our agri-food systems are and caused widespread shortages of basic food supplies worldwide.

Our food value chains need to become stronger and more adaptable to handle system-wide disruptions while meeting growing needs. The food production chain has become more complex and vulnerable because over 70% of international trade now involves intermediate goods crossing multiple borders before reaching consumers. Food systems generate one-third of global greenhouse gas emissions, which shows how current practices harm our environment. New solutions like blockchain food supply chain technologies can help track food better, cut down waste, and make distribution more efficient.

The global food system continues to evolve rapidly. We need to build stronger, more resilient value chains that ensure food security and promote green practices. This piece outlines a complete framework to achieve these goals.

Global Shifts in Agri-Food Trade and Value Chain Integration

The world’s food production value chain looks nothing like it did decades ago. Agricultural products no longer simply cross borders as finished goods. They now flow through complex networks of production stages spread across many countries.

Rise of Intermediate Goods in Food Trade

Global exports of intermediate goods reached USD 2.50 trillion in 2022’s second quarter, growing 4% from the previous year. Food and beverages played a major role in this growth. These products saw a remarkable 20% year-over-year increase, totaling over USD 120 billion. These numbers show how food production now crosses multiple borders before reaching consumers.

The European Union’s trade data from 2023 paints a clear picture. Intermediate goods made up 46.4% of all EU exports and an even higher 60.5% of imports. Some EU countries relied heavily on these goods. Ireland (63.4%), Luxembourg (62.6%), and Finland (60.4%) saw intermediate goods make up more than 60% of what they sold abroad.

ICT and Trade Liberalization as Enablers of GVCs

Information and Communication Technologies reshape the scene of food value chains. These innovative technologies bring several benefits:

• They bridge information gaps between stakeholders 
• Markets become more transparent with lower transaction costs 
• Stakeholders track price, market, and weather data immediately 
• Food safety systems work better with improved traceability 
• Producers share knowledge more easily 

Ground applications of ICTs in agricultural value chains boost competitiveness. REDAGROCLIMA in Chile serves as a great example. This platform sends weather alerts through email and SMS to help producers plan their crops based on climate data.

Trade liberalization laid the groundwork for global value chains to thrive. The WTO’s trade negotiations opened up markets worldwide and cut barriers to food and agricultural trade. The number of active regional trade agreements jumped from less than 100 in 2000 to almost 500 today.

Regionalization vs Globalization in Food Systems

While globalization dominates headlines, food systems show a strong regional pattern too. About 20% of world trade happens between neighboring countries. Countries on the same continent account for roughly 60% of all trade.

Countries trade more with their regional neighbors than with distant partners. Research from 1995 to 2019 shows both global and regional trade grew stronger. The 2008 financial crisis slowed globalization, but regional trade picked up steam.

Trade clusters tell an interesting story. Some clusters stay regional with the same countries, while others grow beyond their regions. To name just one example, see how NAFTA members kept strong food and agricultural trade ties from 1995 to 2019. They later built new connections with South American countries.

A country’s wealth affects its choice of trading partners. Growing trade between rich and poor nations helps spread technology and makes everyone more efficient.

Systemic Risks in the Food Production Value Chain

Global events, tariffs, geopolitical risks have exposed critical weaknesses in our food production chain. These events show how connected systems can destabilize faster when unexpected problems arise. Regular ups and downs in agricultural markets are normal, but system-wide risks threaten entire food networks. Problems cascade through regions and sectors.

COVID-19 and Supply Chain Disruptions

The COVID-19 pandemic tested global food systems like never before. Lockdowns in 2020 transformed how people spent their money. Grocery sales jumped 29% while restaurant sales dropped 27%. This sudden change created unprecedented challenges throughout the food production chain.

The pandemic revealed how inflexible specialized food processing systems were. They struggled to switch between serving restaurants and retail stores. Food service suppliers watched their entire customer base cancel orders. They couldn’t easily sell these products in stores because of packaging differences. Labor shortages made everything worse. Processing plants closed or ran at reduced capacity. This created backlogs in meat processing and strained supply chains.

Online grocery shopping grew to 10-15% of total spending, multiplying five times in just weeks. Companies rushed to hire more workers. Walmart brought on 50,000 new people and Instacart added 300,000 workers.

Geopolitical Tensions, Tariffs and Trade Fragmentation

Geopolitical tensions have grown over the last several years, threatening global food security. Countries work less together now as economic integration reverses. More nations use trade policies as political weapons. They ban exports and add licensing rules that disrupt established food supply chains.

Stricter inspections and customs checks may cause delays, risking spoilage of perishables and compliance issues.
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 triggered 67 new trade policies. These included 38 export bans and licensing requirements. The International Monetary Fund reports trade restrictions have increased since 2020 due to political concerns. These rules make food harder to get and more expensive while disrupting key trade routes.

Nations now view food security as vital to national security. The rise of isolationist thinking has pushed governments to focus on managing their own risks instead of working together. Food trade disruptions happen more often now. In 2022, sixteen countries restricted food exports, affecting 17% of globally traded calories – up from 8% during the pandemic.
Recent American tariffs are inflating costs, disrupting supply chains, and prompting strategic pivots in sourcing and pricing. The ones on the food and beverage industry are multifaceted, affecting supply chains, production costs, consumer prices, and international trade dynamics. Starting from the raw material costs: for example Mexico supplies 63% of U.S. vegetable imports. Companies may switch to cheaper alternatives to avoid tariffs, risking violations if substitutes fail safety standards.

Higher bills and cost of living may drive demand for cheaper products, reducing revenues for premium brands.

Climate-Induced Shocks in Agricultural Trade

Climate change threatens farming and trade in several ways:

• Direct production impacts: Problems in a few major “breadbaskets” can shake the entire global food market 
• Infrastructure disruptions: More floods, landslides, and other climate disasters threaten trade infrastructure 
• Transportation chokepoints: Recent problems in the Panama Canal, Red Sea, and Mississippi River show how vulnerable these routes are to climate events 

The Panama Canal faces its worst drought ever. Daily ship crossings dropped from 36 to about 24, causing losses between $500-700 million in fiscal year 2024. The Mississippi River drought in 2022 cut agricultural exports from Louisiana ports by 3.9%. This led to trade losses of $565 million between July 2022 and January 2023.

Climate change reshapes which countries have advantages in food production. Research shows trade grows between countries with different climates. This suggests nations might adapt to climate change through trade, moving food from places with surplus to those in need.

These system-wide risks combine to create complex challenges. Building green food value chains that can handle future shocks remains crucial.

Frameworks for Analyzing Global Food Value Chains

Global food value chains are complex systems that just need solid analytical frameworks to understand them. Several models have emerged to help us understand the complex relationships between production stages that cross multiple countries and sectors.

Sequential Production Models in Agri-Food GVCs

Sequential production models form the basis of analyzing food production value chains. These frameworks show how companies spread their production stages across borders to streamline processes. Researchers of economics, such as Antràs, Pol and Davin Chor of Harvard Business School, in “Global Value Chains”, a handbook of International Economics, explain how trade costs affect companies’ decisions to place production in different countries. In spite of that, many models are too abstract and don’t fully capture the real-life complexities of agri-food global value chains (GVCs).

Vertical specialization plays a crucial role in these frameworks. It shows how countries excel in specific stages of producing goods. Already in 1998 (in the study “Vertical Specialization and the Changing Nature of World Trade”), David Hummels, a professor of economics at the University of Chicago’s Graduate School of Business, explained that: “a sequential mode of production arises in which a country imports a good from another country, uses that good as an input in the production of its own good, and then exports its good to the next country”. This concept helps us understand why food production processes are becoming more interconnected.

Input–Output Linkages and Value-Added Trade

Input-output frameworks are a great way to get information about value-added content in trade flows and how countries participate in GVCs. These models track where value comes from and where it goes in international trade. They paint a clearer picture of how countries fit into food value chains.

Breaking down gross exports has become crucial as production spreads across borders faster. The gap between gross and value-added exports keeps growing. Hummels and his team first developed vertical specialization measures (VS) to identify foreign content in exports. Later, researchers added other metrics like VS1 (domestic content used as input for re-exports) and VS1* (domestic content of imports).

Downstreamness and Upstreamness Metrics

Upstreamness and downstreamness metrics help assess positions within food value chains. Upstreamness shows how far a product is from final demand by measuring the stages before final consumption. Downstreamness measures the distance from primary production factors.

These metrics use different approaches:

• Output-based measures: The F/GO ratio (final use to gross output) shows whether an industry sells directly to consumers or other producers 
• Input-based measures: The VA/GO ratio (value-added to gross output) reveals an industry’s dependence on primary factors versus intermediate inputs 
• Position-based measures: Advanced metrics look at both input sourcing and output distribution patterns 

These frameworks ended up helping policymakers and companies analyze how trade policies and market changes shape environmentally responsible food value chains in global markets.

Policy Instruments for Sustainable Food Value Chains

Policy instruments build the foundation of sustainable food value chains that can handle systemic shocks and promote inclusive growth. These instruments work in many areas, from international trade frameworks to domestic regulations.

Infrastructure Investment and Logistics Efficiency

Food accessibility depends heavily on transport costs. These costs can make up to 50% of food prices in developing regions. Smart infrastructure investments are vital to create sustainable value chains. The global food logistics market stands at USD 155.10 billion in 2024 and could reach USD 229.00 billion by 2030.

The World Bank’s transport projects aim to improve access to agricultural inputs, cut transport costs, and help move food within and between countries. Countries maintain their market connections through these investments, which helps ensure food availability and stable prices.

Domestic Regulations and Environmental Standards

Environmental regulations and voluntary standards continue to shape food value chains. The WTO’s guidelines state that environmental measures should be transparent, avoid restricting trade too much, and apply fairly.

Regulatory frameworks now include climate disclosures. California’s Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act requires big corporations to report their environmental impact, including their supply chain emissions. The biggest challenge lies in balancing environmental protection with market access. This especially affects developing countries that might lack resources to meet complex standards.

Equity, Inclusion, and Welfare Distribution in GVCs

Women make up 37% of rural agricultural workers worldwide, with this number jumping to 48% in low-income countries. The benefits from food value chains have become more unbalanced since the 1990s. Farmers now receive just 5-10% of what consumers pay for their products.

Rural Household Participation in GVCs

Global Value Chain (GVC) participation shows mixed results for rural households. Families who join agri-food GVCs see their income grow by 22% and spend 40% more on consumption. However, these benefits don’t reach everyone equally. Only about 10% of small farmers worldwide take part in global chains. Success depends on several factors: education, owning a mobile phone, having irrigation, farm size, belonging to farmer groups, and getting extension visits. Small farmers also face other challenges like unfair treatment, poor market information, limited control over decisions, and climate change impacts.

Income Distribution and Food Security Impacts

The money made in food systems goes mostly to big players. Workers get only 6% of the total income, while retailers take 47%. Traders and distributors split the rest at 13% and 34%. Two-thirds of people living in extreme poverty – about 740 million – work in agriculture. Yet some export-focused value chains show promise in fighting poverty. A study found that jobs in horticultural exports helped the poorest families boost their income by 53%. This shows how paid employment can help more people than contract farming, which often leaves out the poorest families.

Gender and Smallholder Inclusion Strategies

Women’s work in food value chains often involves hard physical labor, small-scale selling, and tiny profits. They face discrimination when trying to get decent jobs, services, resources, and market access. Here’s what helps women succeed:

• Building stronger women’s cooperatives, self-help groups, and associations 
• Creating value chains that work better for women and reduce food waste 
• Offering business help and better access to financial services 
• Giving women more control over food production resources 

Value chain programs help women earn more money, own more assets, work more efficiently, and save more. But making more money doesn’t always lead to more power at home or change traditional gender roles in families and communities.

Rethinking Global Food Value Chains

Global food value chains are becoming more complex and vulnerable, and they need our immediate attention and coordinated action. In this piece, international trade patterns have changed dramatically. Cross-border movements now mainly consist of intermediate goods. Technology has become a vital enabler to create eco-friendly food systems. It reduces information gaps and makes markets more transparent in different regions.

The tariffs on the food and beverage industry are multifaceted, affecting supply chain disruptions, raw material costs, logistics and labor, port delays, immigration policies, production and operational challenges, cost pressures, consumer and market shifts, international trade and retaliation, export risks, production costs, consumer prices and international trade dynamics.

Food security faces major systemic risks worldwide. The COVID-19 pandemic revealed how inflexible specialized processing systems can be. Geopolitical tensions continue to break down long-standing trade relationships. Climate change disrupts both production and transportation networks. It affects key routes from the Panama Canal to the Mississippi River. These combined challenges need strong analytical frameworks. They must capture complex relationships between production stages that span multiple countries.

Smart policies help build resilience. Trade agreements, infrastructure investments, and environmental regulations determine how food moves globally. The benefits don’t spread evenly through value chains though. Farmers get only 5-10% of the total value, while retailers take almost half of all income. This gap hits women and smallholders hard, especially when they face ongoing barriers to meaningful participation.

Creating truly eco-friendly food value chains means finding the right balance between efficiency and fairness. Better cooperative structures, gender-aware approaches, and targeted business services can spread benefits more evenly. Standards that go together through organizations like Codex Alimentarius will give developing countries market access while meeting environmental goals.

Our global food systems must grow beyond just being efficient. They need to become more resilient and inclusive. The challenges look overwhelming – from climate disruptions to market concentration. Yet, targeted actions at key points can turn weakness into strength. Food security’s future depends on fair distribution of benefits across these vital global networks, not just producing more food.

Coming soon: Italy’s Textile Turning Point: New EPR Decree Set to Reshape Fashion’s Future